
SHIT!
My aspirations on an exam should never be to "just put points on the board"; no one wants to be the Cleveland Browns of the COP. To be frank: When the hell would an Rph ever schedule an eight day fertility treatment for a patient? Or here's a better one: when would you ever evaluate one for appropriateness? After I got out of there and checked the notes for what she actually wanted, I decided that if one were to actually implement what I put on the exam, they may turn the patient into a wolfman. I mean why would she ever think that's a good idea for a question worth that many points? This is like those shitty products you see on TV and think "Man, you'd think they would test this on a group of people before marketing it." I wouldn't object to doing our exams that way -- take one of us aside and try this stupid test on them before hammering all 130 of us across the face with it.

Nope, killed another one. Better write a new exam
I said it in a previous blog and it was really a joke then, but now it should be the new Endocrine mantra:
They mathematically can't fail us all.
I don't know if you were freaking out like me before the law exam, but there were brief moments when I sincerely had no clue what he was going to ask on this test.
"Who makes coffee every morning at the Board of Pharmacy?"
Uh oh...
"How many blue shirts do I have in my closet?"
52?
If the COP had their way there'd be no way for me to find an office big enough to fit all of my pseudo-qualifications in.
PharmD, MD, OB-GYN, BCPS, JD, Board Certified Dermatologist, PIC, HBIC, and Chief Oompa Loompa at Willy Wonka's suppository factory
Awesome:


No comments:
Post a Comment