There are very few instances where it is even remotely relevant to me whether the issue arises in state or federal law. Sorry -- I don't care. I'm not in law school, I'm in pharmacy school -- I just care what I have to do as a pharmacist. And whats this bull about Riders? Granted, I got the question right on the merits that I'm a lazy bastard and read law notes written by a PY3 but that isn't the point -- it wasn't covered. This is what I hate about classes that deviate from the powerpoint-regurgitate COP cycle: there's no record of what was and wasn't covered. What are we supposed to do, tape every class and send it off to the labs to prove he *never* said "rider" in class?
Have to love the bravado of pushing forward to the next question despited 130 agaped pharmtardy mouths. "Get off my nuts" -- JLF3. The quote was totally implied.
Did anyone else notice Uncle Pete said he was in class early and asked some of us if we had covered malpractice and we said yes? We actually said "No, we didn't cover that." I can see where the confusion comes from.
Carrie Lifshitz is the menstruation rockstar -- her words, not mine.
Awesome:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment